This site demonstrates one possible use of this domain. For acquisition, partnership, or investment inquiries, please use our contact link.
Tool · Implied Probability

Implied Probability & Vig Remover

See the raw implied probability of each side, then strip out the sportsbook's margin to estimate a fair price.

All tools

Implied A

52.38%

Implied B

52.38%

Total (hold)

4.76%

Fair probability A (no-vig)

50.00%

Fair probability B (no-vig)

50.00%

A two-way market with no margin would sum to exactly 100%. Anything over 100% is the sportsbook's built-in hold. We split it proportionally to approximate a fair line - useful as a baseline, not a guaranteed truth.

What implied probability actually tells you

Implied probability is the break-even win rate a sportsbook's odds quote. It is not the book's estimate of the true probability - it is the true probability plus the margin (vig) the book takes. If a price implies 52.4% and you can't beat that win rate, the bet is -EV in the long run regardless of how often it cashes in any short sample.

Formulas this tool uses

  • Negative American odds → implied probability = |odds| / (|odds| + 100)
  • Positive American odds → implied probability = 100 / (odds + 100)
  • Two-way hold = (implied A + implied B) − 1
  • Fair (no-vig) probability = implied / (implied A + implied B)

Worked example - standard -110 / -110 spread

Both sides imply 110 / 210 ≈ 52.38%. Total = 104.76%, so the hold is 4.76%. The fair no-vig probability for each side is 52.38 / 104.76 ≈ 50% - exactly what you would expect from a perfectly balanced market with zero margin.

Worked example - uneven market (-200 / +170)

-200 implies 66.7%. +170 implies 37.0%. Total = 103.7% (hold ≈ 3.7%). Fair no-vig probabilities are 64.3% and 35.7%. If your model says the favorite is closer to 60%, the -200 price is significantly -EV even after stripping the vig.

Common questions

Why don't the two sides of a market add up to 100%?
Because the sportsbook prices in a margin. The amount above 100% is the theoretical hold.
Is the no-vig probability the "true" probability?
It is an approximation. Splitting the vig proportionally is a reasonable baseline but assumes the book's margin is distributed evenly across sides, which is not always true on uneven markets.
How is implied probability used in expected value calculations?
EV requires comparing your estimate of the true probability to the implied probability of the price. If your true estimate exceeds implied by more than the vig, the bet is +EV.